Please fill out the following form and e-mail it to jiti@loyno.edu ---------------------------------------------------------------------- JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IMPACT REVIEW FORM 1. PAPER ID: 2. TITLE OF PAPER: 3. RECOMMENDATION (A to D): A. Accept - Paper is good, publishable as is or with minor changes B. Accept with changes - Publishable, requires some modifications C. Marginal - Paper is fair, requires major modifications D. Reject - Paper is poor or not within JITI's scope 4. JUSTIFICATION FOR RECOMMENDATION. Please rate the significance, originality, technical quality, and clarity of the paper on a scale of 1 (low) to 5 (high). This portion of the review WILL be returned to the author(s). 4a. SIGNIFICANCE (1 to 5): Briefly comment on the significance of the paper. Your comments may focus on the following questions: - How important is the reported work? - Does it reveal the impact of IT on particular domain? - Are the presented effects of IT important/interesting/promising? Please enter your comments here: | | | | 4b. ORIGINALITY (1 to 5): Briefly comment on the originality of the paper. Your comments may focus on the following questions: - Is this a new problem/approach/point of view? - Is this an innovative combination of existing/known techniques? - Has this work (or similar work) been previously reported? - Does the paper include sufficient/appropriate references? Please enter your comments here: | | | | 4c. TECHNICAL QUALITY (1 to 5): Briefly comment on the technical quality of the paper. Your comments may focus on the following questions: - How accurate/reproducible are the results reported in this paper? - How much effort has apparently been invested in this research? - Is there theoretical/experimental support of the presented claims? - Are there any errors in the presented theoretical results/proofs? Please enter your comments here: | | | | 4d. CLARITY (1 to 5): Briefly comment on the clarity of the paper below. Your comments may focus on the following questions: - Is the paper well-organized and well-written? - Will the paper be understandable by the general JITI audience? - Does the presentation allow a substantive evaluation of the work? - Are the references in APA style? Please enter your comments here: | | | | 4e. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO AUTHOR(S). Please enter your comments here: | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: The information below this line will NOT be sent to the author(s) 5. COMMENTS TO THE EDITORIAL BOARD: | | | 6. REVIEWER'S NAME: 7. REVIEWER'S EMAIL: 8. REVIEWER'S TELEPHONE NUMBER: ( ) ___ - _____